APK Oasis

Here's Why Medieval Beef Olives Didn't Actually Include Any Olives - The Takeout

From The Takeout

Here's Why Medieval Beef Olives Didn't Actually Include Any Olives - The Takeout

The names of certain dishes forever tease us with riddles from their culinary history -- like she-crab soup, which may have traveled from Scotland to South Carolina, or the iconic Boston cream pie which is technically a cake. Then there are beef olives -- a comforting dish that reminds many people of homecooked dinners and a favorite of celebrity chef and restaurateur, Jamie Oliver. Beef olives are full of flavor, can be stuffed with various fillings, and are delicious when cooked low and slow -- a great way to tenderize tough cuts of meat. Though today, some people might toss olives into the recipe, historically the dish, which was popular in 16th-century Britain, never contained any olives. And, as it turns out, even beef wasn't a regular feature until the 18th century, with veal and mutton used just as frequently.

So, why the name? The dish itself is straightforward enough: Thin slices of beef are stuffed, tied, and rolled before being cooked until tender. One theory about the dish's origins theorizes that these stuffed rolls, with their compact, oval shape, resemble olives, leading to the name. However, the explanation most food historians seem to agree on is that beef olives look like larks (more specifically ones whose heads have been cut off ready to eat), known as "aloes" in French. Historians believe that olives, in this context, are a linguistic evolution, or a mispronunciation, of the word "aloes."

Previous articleNext article

POPULAR CATEGORY

Software

35304

Artificial_Intelligence

12291

Internet

26604